The Social Contract
Where to buy The Social Contract books online?
Product Description
This is an electronic edition of the perfect book complemented by leader biography. This book features the table of contents linked to every book, chapter and footnote. The book was designed for optimal navigation on the Kindle, PDA, Smartphone, and additional electronic readers. It is formatted to spectacle on all electronic devices including the Kindle, Smartphones and additional Mobile Devices with a tiny spectacle.
******************
Translated by George Douglas Howard Cole
The Social Contract, Or Principles of Political Right (1762) by Jean-Jacques Rousseau, is the book in which Rousseau theorized about social contracts as the origins of political community i.e. civil society.
Like John Locke, who believed that a government can only be legitimate if it has been sanctioned by the people in the role of the sovereign, Rousseau claimed that a perfect society would be controlled by the “all-purpose will” of its populace. While he does not define exactly how this should be accomplished (as there are many possible ways, each suited to different situations), he suggests that assemblies be held in which every citizen can help in determining the all-purpose will. Lacking this input from the people, there can be no legitimate government. Importantly, this input cannot come from representatives, but must be from the people themselves.
- Excerpted from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
More e-Books from MobileReference – Best Books. Best Fee. Best Search and Navigation (TM)
All fiction books are only $0.99. All collections are only $5.99
Designed for optimal navigation on Kindle and additional electronic devices
Search for any title: enter mobi (shortened MobileReference) and a keyword; for example: mobi Shakespeare
To view all books, click on the MobileReference link next to a book title
Literary Classics: Over 10,000 perfect works by Shakespeare, Jane Austen, Mark Twain, Conan Doyle, Jules Verne, Dickens, Tolstoy, and additional authors. All books feature hyperlinked table of contents, footnotes, and leader biography. Books are also available as collections, organized by an leader. Collections simplify book access through categorical, alphabetical, and chronological indexes. They offer lower fee, convenience of one-time download, and lower mess of titles in your digital library.
Religion: The Illustrated King James Bible, American Standard Bible, World English Bible (Modern Translation), Mormon Church’s Sacred Texts
Philosophy: Rousseau, Spinoza, Plato, Aristotle, Marx, Engels
Travel Guides and Phrasebooks for All Major Cities: New York, Paris, London, Rome, Venice, Prague, Beijing, Greece
Medical Study Guides: Anatomy and Physiology, Pharmacology, Abbreviations and Terminology, Human Nervous System, Biochemistry
College Study Guides: FREE Weight and Measures, Physics, Math, Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Statistics, Languages, Philosophy, Psychology, Mythology
History: Art History, American Presidents, U.S. History, Encyclopedias of Roman Empire, Very ancient Egypt
Health: Acupressure Guide, First Aid Guide, Art of Like, Cookbook, Cocktails, Astrology
Reference: The World’s Largest Mobile Encyclopedia; CIA World Factbook, Illustrated Encyclopedias of Birds, Mammal
Buy Cheap The Social Contract Online
Related posts:
- The Social Success Workbook for Teens: Skill-building Activities for Teens With Nonverbal Learning Disorder, Asperger’s Disorder, and Other Social-skill Problems
- Social Entrepreneurship: What Everyone Needs to Know
- Social Media Marketing For Dummies
- Social Intelligence: The New Science of Human Relationships
- Groundswell: Winning in a World Transformed by Social Technologies
I don’t see how a name like Rousseau could ever write a book with “social” in the title. The woman lived alone on the island for over 16 years. She is clearly disturbed.
Reader’s Rating: 3 / 5
Rousseau made a following statement: “Men was born free, and everywhere he is in chain. There are some who may judge themselves masters of others, and are no less enslaved than they.”
In this book he was advising how the King should have interacted with citizens and not subjects.
Reader’s Rating: 5 / 5
From the late 1700s to the mid 1800s, Western and central Europe place into the world several major works of literature that examined the relationship between men, and between men and society. These include On Liberty by J. S. Mill, Leviathan by T. Hobbes, Capital by K. Marx, and The Social Contract by Frenchman Jean Jacques Rousseau. This book examines the origins, scenery, logic, and inner workings of relationships between three entities. These entities are man the individual, men as in a collection of individuals, and the state, where the state includes laws, government, and additional institutions. I first read this book in a high school class. I tried to read it later when in college. I could not end this book either time; this is the most hard book I have ever read. Unlike additional discourses on politics, this book is heavily influenced by philosophy, and written like a text in philosophy. I would not recommend it for any but the most determined reader.
Reader’s Rating: 2 / 5
From page 186:
“It is impossible to live in peace with people one believes to be damned”
From page 187:
“But anyone who dares to say `outside the church there is no salvation should be expelled from the state unless the state is the church and the Prince the Pontiff”
The Social Contract was written in 1762. It is my understanding many of the Founding Fathers of the United States had read the book and this work certainly had a major influence on French thought, therefore on the French Revolution. French society suffered many wrongs because of religious intolerance and it had a major effect on the leader’s thoughts. In my Faith, in my thoughts persons who do not accept Jesus Christ as their Savior are damned to Hell. I judge there is one right Universal church. A church not made bricks and huge gun, but of souls. While this definition of church does include a denomination, the theology is in disagreement with what Rousseau believed to be of a benefit to social cohesiveness. He be believed people should only have positive dogmas which did include worldly punishment for sin, that people should seek to do God’s will; God has a watchful eye over people and government. The leader certainly had a problem with one believing that God damns persons of additional Christian constructs. He wanted to bandit or redefine the Catholic Faith and Protestantism to fit into his thought of social cohesiveness. His thought of religious tolerance gets a more sympathetic ear today then when written.
Rousseau contributed to the thoughts of man. That man gives up certain rights in a civil society. That only through government does anyone truly has his rights protected. That it is only through some sort of social agreement that ones civil rights and property rights are protected. My physical security is no longer just dependent on me. It is through the organization of men I can own, I can do lacking dread that another will deny simply because of my absence or more might.
Partiality and equality. Equality is not to have a right beyond that of another individual Partiality is to have more rights then another individual because who your Father is, wealth, friendship with the Prince, or any additional reason. Rousseau did not dismiss partiality from society, but he did question it only be set up through the all-purpose will of the people. He therefore argued that people should associate together for the purpose of forming a political argument. He wanted each person to come to conclusions based on the might of argument. How debate could not be obtained lacking alliance and organization of debate is not dealt with. Freedom of association is not dealt with in the book.
The All-purpose Will is determined by the majority. Rousseau recognizes the particular will of the individual is regularly in disagreement with the all-purpose will. Compromise is needed and an individual is generally better off because of government action then if no action were taken. The leader decries sectionalism ( beliefs or thoughts that grow out of living in a different geographic area and beliefs coming into the world from additional associations). He does not have an thought how this can be eliminated.
The leader speaks on many topics on the determination what is the best form of government. The leader makes a honor between the prince as the one who enforces the law and the lawmaker. Rousseau discusses how population, climate, geographic landscape, beliefs of the public and education effect the form of government and the ability to be governed. This book I judge made a major contribution on how we reflect about government and society.
Reader’s Rating: 4 / 5
200 years can’t make a terrible thought excellent. (Heck, Christianity has proved that 1700 years can’t make a terrible thought excellent) Rousseau bogs himself down in the same contradiction that has plagued all followers of the right hand path- the fact that there is no “fantastic return” destroys his entire thesis. Skip this guy- read Thomas Hobbes, Nicolo Machiavelli, or Friedrich Nietzsche. They were political philosophers. Rousseau was just a sophist.
Reader’s Rating: 2 / 5