The New Jerusalem
Where to buy The New Jerusalem books online?
Product Description
This is a reproduction of a book published before 1923. This book may have occasional imperfections such as missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant inscription, etc. that were either part of the original manufactured article, or were introduced by the scanning process. We judge this work is culturally vital, and despite the imperfections, have elected to bring it back into print as part of our continuing commitment to the preservation of printed works worldwide. We appreciate your understanding of the imperfections in the preservation process, and hope you delight in this valuable book.
Buy Cheap The New Jerusalem Online
Related posts:
G.K. Chesterton displays his level of wit and insights into Palestine. His candid views are open here in a style that is fresh and appealing to modern readers. I highly recommend “The New Jerusalem”.
Reader’s Rating: 5 / 5
When G. K . Chesterton published The New Jerusalem he was called an anti Semite. He denied it but after reading the book it’s pretty clear that Jews were not his favorite people. He refers to the poor newly arrived immigrant Jews as tacky to the point of hideousness and showered contempt on the sophisticated fully assimilated upper class London Jews. He even goes as far as to opine that had a fantastic disaster had befallen England during Benjamin Disraeli’s years as prime minister, Disraeli (because he was Jewish) probably would’ve sailed off to America or somewhere else lacking a thought for England. That’s harsh.
Chesterton also had sour things to say about Orthodox Christians. His comments on the religious Jews of Jerusalem are a small kinder or at least less mean but his only real admiration seems to have been for the Muslims of what was then called Palestine. He seems to have viewed them like we view wild lions today. You can’t help but be awed by the beasts but you also know that if that they’re treacherous.
Finally, this cold, gloomy book makes a startling prediction that has, alas, come horribly right. Chesterton bluntly stated that the area known as Palestine was hopelessly divided if a Jewish state was ever customary there the local Arabs would fight it.
Please don’t come to this book looking for the cuddly fellow who wrote the Father Brown tales because he is not here.
Reader’s Rating: 4 / 5
The New Jerusalem reprints G. K. Chesterton’s classic travelogue in which he sought to better know the Middle East in the years following World War I. Nearly three decades before the creation of the State of Israel, Chesterton experimental the Christians, Jews, and Muslims of Palestine; his unvarnished conclusions are open at face value, lacking any allowances for political correctness or additional modern contrivances. In addition to his blunt assessments and judgments are also a marvel of firsthand description and depiction of ordinary people extant day-to-day life, and evidence of seekers searching the holy land for revelation, and extended philosophical speculation concerning the very ancient histories destinies of races and faiths of people. Though limited by Chesterton’s individual perspective and opinions, The New Jerusalem is an invaluable addition to collective understanding concerning Palestine and how it was viewed by individuals and religious organizations nearly a century ago.
Reader’s Rating: 5 / 5
G.K. Chesteron’s book titled THE NEW JERUSALEM is the only “mad” book this reviewer has ever read of Chesterton’s vast literary work. This book is not for the timid or the dull. Persons who are serious Catholics, religious Jews, or devout Muslims will learn from this book. Persons who religious views are fashionable and politically right will be shocked by honest language and thoughtful insight.
Chesteton reminds readers that Palestine and Judea (modern Israel)was at one time under Very ancient Roman control and during the late 11th. and 12th. centuries under European control. The complex history of the Middle East includes peoples of different cultures, languages, and political views. The fact is that Europeans as well as Western Asians. The Middle East was “the cradle” of early Catholocism, the flowering of Judaism, and the original area of Islam.
Persons who are aware of the Byzantine rule know that the Byzantines used the Greek language. Yet, they ruled using Roman Law, and the Greek Orthodox Church was very similiar to the Catholic Church. As an aside, the Greek Orthodox ligurgy and sacramental system are similiar to persons of Catholicism. This reviewer is very aware that there are differences which have caused bitterness and schism.
Chesterton chides the British for not knowing small or nothing of the Middle East, and the same could be said of American “experts” whose knowledge of the history and georgraphy of this area is either nil or fictitious nonsense. Chesterton contrasts the vague, undignified language of modern policy “experts” with the clear yet poetic bluntness of the Ancient Hebrew Prophets whose denounciations was reasonably understandable by persons whom they condemned.
Contrary to modern fads and notions, Jerusalem was and is a place of plain religious and cultural differences which has exploded at times in violence and bitter clashes. As Chesterton makes clear, modern fashionable Protestantism would never have survived in Jerusalem. Islam, Judaism and Catholcism did.
Chesterton saw the post World War I situation with prophetic vision. He argued that while there was no war, there was no actual peace, and the Middle East was an armned camp. This was a problem for the British who were under the illusion that their inherent superiority and arrogant ignorance would protect them from the realities that Chesterton clearly understood.
Chesterton reserves his most serious writing for Zionism. He presents persons of the Jewish faith that they were Europeans or Zionists. Chesterton DOES NOT condemn Judaism. He was critical of what some may consider Jewish Jingoism as compared to Judaism as a religion. By avoiding these issues British, and later American, policy makers tried to wield their influence with small knowledge much to their chagrin. Chesterton argued that Europeans regardless of their religion benefitted from Catholic Canon Law, a gradual respect for officially authorized rights, and the rediscovery of reason via Aristotle and Catholic Scholasticism. The Zionists were forced to question themselves whether or not they were Westerners. This is still a current debate. Chesterton commented that he had more respect for Jewish radicals who championed the rights of the poor than he had for the wealthy plutocrats, Jewish or not.
G.K. Chesterton knew that after World War I, the Middle East was a political powder keg. One weakness of this book is that Chesterton could have critisized the Balfour Declaration (1917) which was so poorly written and vague that both Arabs and Jewish Zionists could use it to justify their political aspirations. An Very ancient Hebrew Prophet would have been much clearer and succinct.
G.K. Chesterton defends his views from a Catholic point of view. THE NEW JERUSALEM is a well written and blunt assessment of the Middle East that thoughtful men (there are so few of such men) will have a better understanding of the past drama (a tragic past drama)that is evolving. What is more tragic is that sensible men were avoided or ignored when something could have been done during and just after World War I. But men in power were and are seldom sensible.
Reader’s Rating: 5 / 5