The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership: Follow Them and People Will Follow You
Where to buy The 21 Certain Laws of Leadership: Follow Them and People Will Follow You books online?
Product Description
In The 21 Certain Laws of Leadership, John C. Maxwell combines insights learned from his 40-plus years of leadership successes and mistakes with observations from the worlds of business, politics, sports, religion, and military conflict. Some highlights of the revised edition of this New York Times bestseller, which has sold more than a million copies, are:
- Every chapter has been revised
- 2 chapters – “The Law of Addition” and “The Law of the Picture” – are entirely new
- 17 new tales are included
- 6 chapters are 50% revised
- 5 chapters are 75% revised
- Application pieces follow every chapter
- Leadership evaluation is included
Buy Cheap The 21 Certain Laws of Leadership: Follow Them and People Will Follow You Online
Related posts:
- The Year of Living Biblically: One Man’s Humble Quest to Follow the Bible as Literally as Possible
- When Good People Have Affairs: Inside the Hearts & Minds of People in Two Relationships
- Dealing with People You Can’t Stand: How to Bring Out the Best in People at Their Worst
- Laws
- The 48 Laws of Power

This is a revised edition of the first book I ever read on leadership. It is an brilliant book for new leaders and persons who have been in management for awhile but who need a small inspiration. The law of the lid (chapter one) is absolutely right!
Reader’s Rating: 5 / 5
I just read the preview provided by amazon for this book. The plot of “Leadership lacking Success” establish on the first few pages is a bit incorrect, in my view.
Its a simple plot, with “Leadership Ability” on the “y” axis, and “Success Dedication” on the “x” axis. The plot is proposed to show that lacking much “Leadership ability”, even with much “Success Dedication” the overall “effectiveness” of the enterprise is much cut-rate.
In my opinion, the “x” axis should just be “Dedication”. “Success” would be the same thing as “effectiveness”, since “Leadership Ability” combined with “Dedication” lead to “effectiveness”, which leads to some level of “success” (Leadership Ability AND Dedication -> effectiveness -> success).
Also, if the leader is right about the “Law of Diminishing Returns”, then the “x” axis has the incorrect units (probably in order to simplify the math in order to get the concept across). “Dedication” would increase say “exponentially”, and the “x” axis should be a logarithm scale ( log10(x) = z is the same thing as 10^z = x). So, the units on the “x” axis should be multiples of 10 (1, 10, 100, 1000 .. etc .. where x = 10^0, 10^1, 10^2, 10^3, etc). The exponent “z” increases linearly while the value “x” increases exponentially. The logarithm scale is used to plot exponential data values, so this would work better.
The plot itself is meant to convey subjective information (the virtures of “leadership” and “dedication”), so some might argue that using a log scale is overkill. Using a plot to place a figure on subjective virtues mathematically suggests that the virtues establish within an individual person can be neatly quantified. Therefore, the use of algebraic models to represent subjective virtues could be said to be simply inaccurate and possibly misleading, since the same rating (“4, “8″, etc) might not be repeated when different judges are polled. At this point, such ratings become exercises in statistics, where ratings are apart of a statistical distributon of values, and the ratings reported tend to be averages or mean values from a distribution of votes.
But, mathematics is used to model the physical world (e.g.: Physics), based on simplifying assumptions (which but may not permanently hold right) that allow for tractable solutions. Although the leader’s purpose for this plot is simply to convey an thought, rather than to arrive at a algebraic function, using a log scale on the “x” axis helps to convey the concept of the “Law of Diminishing Returns” as pointed out by the leader. If the reader returns to this plot in the future, the law of diminshing returns would be self-contained within the graph, lacking need for review of the text.
This criticism aside, I appreciated the list of laws outlined in the Table of Contents. If the reader enjoys this book, they might also delight in the book entitled “The 48 Laws of Power” by Robert Greene. “The bestselling book for persons who want power, watch power, or want to arm themselves against power”. It is an brilliant read for persons who appreciate classical literature (or in my case persons who never read the classics but who can through this book glean something from them). It may seem too abstract or “heady” to some, but. It got me through graduate school (dealing with bureaucracies, professors, additional grad students, etc).
Reader’s Rating: 4 / 5
The theme matter of the book is really fantastic, but in my humble opinion, the manner of language of it is pretty dull. I bought the book to pre-read before sending off to my 23-year ancient daughter (recent college grad) and I know it won’t capture her attention…it didn’t capture mine.
Reader’s Rating: 3 / 5
This book should be called “The 21 questionable opinions of leadership”. First, some of these “laws” I don’t really agree with, what laws anyway? These are mere opinons of the writer. Laws should have some research to back them up, these don’t. Most of them anyway.
I do agree with most of these opinions in the book (nothing new here) but if you read a book about leadership you kind of expect to read something that you could use in our own life and leadership. Here these “laws” just get explanied from the writer then there are really no practical ways of implementing them.
If you want to read laws about leadership, get “First, break all the rules” or “7 habits of highly effective people” as a replacement for.
Reader’s Rating: 2 / 5
The book is OK is you skip all the beaten tales used by all authors to make the book thicker: Ghandi, Lincoln, etc. Lacking all of them, this book would be only 10 well worth pages long.
Reader’s Rating: 3 / 5