SuperFreakonomics: Global Cooling, Patriotic Prostitutes, and Why Suicide Bombers Should Buy Life Insurance
Where to buy SuperFreakonomics: Global Cooling, Patriotic Prostitutes, and Why Suicide Bombers Should Buy Life Insurance books online?
- ISBN13: 9780060889579
- Condition: NEW
- Notes: Brand New from Publisher. No Remainder Mark.
Product Description
The New York Times bestselling Freakonomics was a worldwide sensation, selling more than four million copies in thirty-five languages and changing the way we look at the world.
Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner return with Superfreakonomics, and fans and newcomers alike will find that the freakquel is even bolder, more amusing, and more surprising than the first.
SuperFreakonomics challenges the way we reflect all over again, exploring the hidden side of everything with such questions as:
- How is a street prostitute like a department-store Santa?
- What do hurricanes, heart attacks, and highway deaths have in common?
- Can eating kangaroo save the planet?
Levitt and Dubner mix smart thinking and fantastic storytelling like no one else. By examining how people respond to incentives, they show the world for what it really is—excellent, terrible, hideous, and, in the final analysis, super freaky. Freakonomics has been imitated many times over—but only now, with SuperFreakonomics, has it met its match.
Amazon.com Review
Book Description
The New York Times best-selling Freakonomics was a worldwide sensation, selling over four million copies in thirty-five languages and changing the way we look at the world. Now, Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner return with SuperFreakonomics, and fans and newcomers alike will find that the freakquel is even bolder, more amusing, and more surprising than the first.
Four years in the building, SuperFreakonomics questions not only the tough questions, but the unexpected ones: What’s more treacherous, driving drunk or walking drunk? Why is chemotherapy prescribed so regularly if it’s so ineffective? Can a sex change boost your salary?
SuperFreakonomics challenges the way we reflect all over again, exploring the hidden side of everything with such questions as:
- How is a street prostitute like a department-store Santa?
- Why are doctors so terrible at washing their hands?
- How much excellent do car seats do?
- What’s the best way to catch a terrorist?
- Did TV cause a rise in crime?
- What do hurricanes, heart attacks, and highway deaths have in common?
- Are people hard-wired for altruism or egocentricity?
- Can eating kangaroo save the planet?
- Which adds more value: a pimp or a Realtor?
Levitt and Dubner mix smart thinking and fantastic storytelling like no one else, whether investigating a solution to global warming or explaining why the fee of oral sex has fallen so drastically. By examining how people respond to incentives, they show the world for what it really is excellent, terrible, hideous, and, in the final analysis, super freaky.
Freakonomics has been imitated many times over but only now, with SuperFreakonomics, has it met its match.
From Superfreakonomics: Where do you stand on the freak-o-meter?
Four years ago, you were cool. You read Freakonomics when it first came out. You impressed family tree and friends and dazzled dates with the insights you gleaned. Now Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner return with Superfreakonomics, a freakquel even bolder, more amusing, and more surprising than the first.
Have you been keeping up? Can you call yourself a SuperFreak? Test your Superfreakonomics know-how now:
Question 1: 5 points
According to Superfreakonomics, what has been most helpful in improving the lives of women in rural India?
A. The government ban on dowries and sex-selective abortions
B. The spread of cable and satellite television
C. Projects that pay women to not abort female babies
D. Condoms made specially for the Indian market
Question 2: 3 points
Among Chicago street prostitutes, which night of the week is the most profitable?
A. Saturday
B. Monday
C. Wednesday
D. Friday
Question 3: 5 points
You land in an urgent situation room with a serious condition and your fate lies in the hands of the doctor you draw. Which characteristic doesn’t seem to matter in terms of doctor skill?
A. Attended a top-ranked medical school and served a position at a prestigious hospital
B. Is female
C. Gets high ratings from peers
D. Spends more money on treatment
Question 4: 3 points
Which cancer is chemotherapy more likely to be effective for?
A. Lung cancer
B. Melanoma
C. Leukemia
D. Pancreatic cancer
Question 5: 5 points
Half of the decline in deaths from heart disease is mainly attributable to:
A. Inexpensive drugs
B. Angioplasty
C. Grafts
D. Stents
Question 6: 3 points
Right or Fake: Child car seats do a better job of protecting children over the age of 2 from auto fatalities than regular seat belts.
Question 7: 5 points
What’s the best thing a person can do personally to cut greenhouse gas emissions?
A. Drive a hybrid car
B. Eat one less hamburger a week
C. Buy all your food from local sources
Question 8: 3 points
Which is most effective at stopping the greenhouse effect?
A. Public-awareness campaigns to discourage consumption
B. Cap-and-trade agreements on carbon emissions
C. Volcanic explosions
D. Planting lots of trees
Question 9: 5 points
In the 19th century, one of the gravest threats of childbearing was puerperal fever, which was regularly fatal to mother and child. Its cause was finally determined to be:
A. Forceful bindings of petticoats early in the pregnancy
B. Foul air in the manner of language wards
C. Doctors not taking sanitary precautions
D. The mother rising too soon in the manner of language room
Question 10: 3 points
Which of the following were not aftereffects of the World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks on September 11, 2001:
A. The decrease in airline traffic slowed the spread of influenza.
B. Thanks to extra police in Washington, D.C., crime fell in that city.
C. The psychological effects of the attacks caused people to cut back on their consumption of alcohol, which led to a decrease in traffic accidents.
D. The increase in border security was a boon to some California farmers, who, as Mexican and Canadian imports declined, sold so much marijuana that it became one of the states most valuable crops.
Answers and Scoring
Question 1
B, Cable and satellite TV. Women with television were less willing to tolerate wife beating, less likely to admit to having a “son inclination,” and more likely to exercise personal autonomy. Plus, the men were perhaps too busy watching cricket.
Question 2
A, Saturday nights are the most profitable. While Friday nights are the busiest, the single greatest determinant of a prostitute’s fee is the point trick she is hired to perform. And for whatever reason, Saturday customers buy more expensive services.
Question 3
C, One factor that doesn’t seem to matter is whether a doctor is highly rated by his or her colleagues. Persons named as best by their colleagues turned out to be no better than average at lowering death excise–although they did spend less money on treatments.
Question 4
C, Leukemia. Chemotherapy has proven effective on some cancers, including leukemia, lymphoma, Hodgkin’s disease, and testicular cancer, especially if these cancers are detected early. But in most cases, chemotherapy is remarkably ineffective, regularly showing zero perceptible effect. That said, cancer drugs make up the second-largest category of pharmaceutical sales, with chemotherapy comprising the bulk.
Question 5
A, Inexpensive drugs. Expensive medical procedures, while technologically dazzling, are reliable for a remarkably tiny share of the improvement in heart disease. Roughly half of the decline has come from reductions in risk factors like high cholesterol and high blood pressure, both of which are treated with relatively inexpensive drugs. And much of the remaining decline is thanks to ridiculously inexpensive treatments like aspirin, heparin, ACE inhibitors, and beta-blockers.
Question 6
Fake. Based on wide data analysis as well as crash tests paid for by the authors, ancient-fashioned seat belts do just as well as car seats.
Question 7
B, Shifting less than one day per week’s worth of calories from red meat and dairy products to chicken, fish, eggs, or a vegetable-based diet achieves more greenhouse-gas reduction than buying all locally sourced food, according to a recent study by Christopher Weber and H. Scott Matthews, two Carnegie Mellon researchers. Every time a Prius or additional hybrid owner drives to the grocery store, she may be cancelling out its emissions-sinking benefit, at least if she shops in the meat section. Emission from cows, as well as sheep and additional ruminants, are 25 times more potent as a greenhouse gas than the carbon dioxide unrestricted by cars and humans.
Question 8
C, the 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines discharged more than 20 million tons of sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere, which acted like a layer of sunscreen, sinking the amount of solar radiation and cooling off the planet by an average of one degree F.
Question 9
C, doctors not taking sanitary precautions. This was the dawning age of the autopsy, and doctors did not yet know the importance of washing their hands after leaving the autopsy room and entering the manner of language room.
Question 10
C, the psychological effect of the attacks caused people to increase their alcohol consumption, and traffic accidents increased as a result.
Scoring
32-40: Certified SuperFreak
25-31: Freak–surprises lay in wait for you
16-24: Wannabe freak–you’ve got some reading to do
1-15: Conventional wisdomer–you’re still thinking in ancient ways
Buy Cheap SuperFreakonomics: Global Cooling, Patriotic Prostitutes, and Why Suicide Bombers Should Buy Life Insurance Online
Related posts:
- Power, Sex, Suicide: Mitochondria and the Meaning of Life
- For Colored Girls Who Have Considered Suicide When the Rainbow Is Enuf
- Final Exit : The Practicalities of Self-Deliverance and Assisted Suicide for the Dying
- The Professor, the Banker, and the Suicide King: Inside the Richest Poker Game of All Time
- Global Environmental Politics

I liked this reasonably a bit until I got to the last chapter on global warming which is dry as reading a science textbook.
Reader’s Rating: 2 / 5
I haven’t read this book but I know climate change risk is high enough that we can’t afford the gamble these authors reportedly advocate. A professional gambler NEVER bets over half his bankroll on even a sure thing. To postpone greenhouse gas reduction is to bet everything on far less than a sure thing.
Reader’s Rating: 1 / 5
I loved Freakonomics very much. Not being an practiced in the areas they covered, I trusted their presentation of facts. Their analysis, even if contrarian, seemed compelling and likely right. Sorry to say, their misrepresentation of CO2 and climate change in this book is so clearly skewed, so designed to sell books rather than reveal insights, that it calls into question their all-purpose approach to fact-based analysis. Very disappointing.
Reader’s Rating: 1 / 5
Once again, Levitt (the economist of the two authors), has proven that he is one of the outstanding minds in the country.
There will be people on the left, persons that don’t like people to disagree with them, who will pan this book lacking reading it, for, excellent grief, Levitt has contrarian views on an issue that the left wants clogged – global warming – because the left knows there is levelheaded evidence to keep discussing the issue. And Levitt has simple solutions that will interefere with the Green Industry growing up around global warming.
The reason there are so many low stars on the reviews is that the left is worried you’ll read this book, and they team jump to oppose views they don’t like.
Reader’s Rating: 5 / 5
After racing through all 216 pages, it sadly dawned on me that SUPERFREAKONOMICS has nothing at all to do with the financial wizardry of Rick James!
Fool me once, Mr. Levitt and Mr. Dubner…
Reader’s Rating: 5 / 5