Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
Where to buy Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action books online?
Product Description
The governance of natural resources used by many individuals in common is an issue of increasing concern to policy analysts. Both state control and privatization of resources have been advocated, but neither the state nor the market have been uniformly successful in solving common pool resource problems. After critiquing the foundations of policy analysis as applied to natural resources, Elinor Ostrom here provides a unique body of empirical data to explore conditions under which common pool resource problems have been satisfactorily or unsatisfactorily solved. Dr. Ostrom first describes three models most frequently used as the foundation for recommending state or market solutions. She then outlines theoretical and empirical alternatives to these models in order to illustrate the diversity of possible solutions. In the following chapters she uses institutional analysis to examine different ways–both successful and unsuccessful–of governing the commons. In contrast to the proposition of the tragedy of the commons argument, common pool problems sometimes are solved by voluntary organizations rather than by a coercive state. Among the cases considered are communal tenure in meadows and forests, irrigation communities and additional water rights, and fisheries.
Buy Cheap Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action Online
Related posts:
The book has wide highlightling in it as was sold as being in ‘excellent’ condition. I would have rated it as honest.
Reader’s Rating: 3 / 5
I have but thumbed it yet; appealing and case-based; but I immediately feel the huge deficiency in its not addressing the politics of Allegiance, which over-ride even self interest. 70% of US wants single payer health care; but a strident 20% is whipped up by Pharma and insurance; is not health care in very one’s interest? Even if you do not agree with Obama et al on the health care issue, it is a clear example of how chauvinistic allegiance is susceptible to sloganeering and impervious to rationality.
It does not matter if we blame it on inadequate education, high school football, baptists or wotever; it has been part of America since 1700. Pretend that it is not a governing principle and your game theory will not cut the huge league. I like that “justice is conflict” (Hampshire) basis and pragma of law; but it ain’t gonna beat that hysterical dogma out of being.
The NRA is not just “I gotta gub”, but a fraternity for Freedom rooted in inalienable pig-headedness. Are they in or out of Ostrom’s commons?
Reader’s Rating: 2 / 5
Aldo Leopold wrote, “We must learn to live on a piece of land lacking spoiling it.” Ostrom’s body of work analyzes how people in different places are attempting to do that. Some fail, a few make it and her analysis of cases and design principles for nested institutional and stakeholder interaction should be mandatory reading for natural resource, ecosystem, or environmental managers. Politicians and government administrators would benefit from applying her work to any allocation issue.
Reader’s Rating: 4 / 5
Elinor Ostrom’s “Governing the Commons” can be divided into several segments. First, an introduction to traditional theory regarding the management of Common Pool Resources. This is primarily based on the choice between privatization or socialization. Second, she presents her theory of Common Pool Resources (Why they make it or fail). Third, she describes case studies regarding Common Pool Resources that clearly work, mostly work, and have largely failed. Fourth, she finishes the book with a overarching chapter summing up her theory with a call for further research. The work takes an interdepartmental approach at analyzing Common Pool Resources.
Her theory stresses a series of vital characteristics that will determine whether a Common Pool Resource succeeds or fails.
1. Clearly defined boundaries
2. Congruence between appropriation
3. Collective-choice arrangements
4. Effective monitoring
5. Graduated sanctions
6. Conflict-Resolution Mechanisms
7. Minimal recognition of rights to organize
8. Nested Enterprises
(Taken from my notes at the end of CH4. She carefully clarifies each point and why each has a varying degree of importance.)
“Governing the Commons” is a groundbreaking work in the school of Institutionalism. An economy cannot function lacking proper institutions. Too regularly economists snub institutions because of the difficulty in making realistic models. Ostrom’s seminal work has provided the groundwork necessary to make better public policy.
Reader’s Rating: 5 / 5
I am surprised that there’s small review activity going on for this book, even though the leader has won the “fake nobel” prize (i.e. the “fee in memory of alfred nobel” for economy). Regardless of what one thinks about the fake nobel, the leader is certainly a name whose achievements deserve recognition. This book is a pedagogical synopsis of the vital work that she’s done in relation to “Common Pool Resources”.
It is written in an accurate and scientific style that never falls into the jargon trap. This gives a plain impression of the leader as a name open minded and keeping her thinking clear and all ears on the facts.
After an introduction on her intentions and method, she presents the so called “tragedy of the commons” (and its close kin, the “prisoner’s dilemna”) as a situation where theoretical thinking sees central intervention as the only way to break the (self)destructive behaviour predicted and regularly experimental: everyone tries to appropriate as much as they can get away from common resources until persons resources collapse and everyone becomes worse off. She then calls attention to several meadow situations where individuals have been able to organize themselves to avoid falling into this trap lacking external intervention. The situations described are as diverse as mountain terrain in Switzerland, irrigation land in Spain and the Philippines or even fisheries in Turkey. Ostrom provides a detailed description of the salient features of these institutions before highlighting the common ground and the differences. She points out that these examples have institutions that have been stable for a long time and that we’re therefore unsure about the process through which the institutions themselves were made.
She then turns to more recent examples of successful institutions managing CPR where information is available regarding the institutional development that led to the current situation. The key examples are water management institutions in California and a project to improve local irrigation communities in Sri Lanka. She finally contrasts successful institutions with failing ones, with a view to identify whether factors that may have been thought of as being factors of success may not really be beside the point.
The overall message of the book is that it is possible for local communities to take care of themselves and to efficiently manage CPR. It is not simple though and certain type of government intervention really makes the matter worse. Likewise privatization is also not a one size fits all solution. So she’s basically highlighting the need to consider each situation on its own, lacking ideological glasses. She provides a framework to analyze each point case, but certainly avoids over-generalization.
The world needs more people like Ostrom, (i.e. lucid thinkers genuinely interested to know what goes on). Too terrible the predictable social “scientist” seems to be more interested to bend the facts to fit to his theories and ideologies.
Reader’s Rating: 5 / 5