Citizens of London: The Americans Who Stood with Britain in Its Darkest, Finest Hour
Where to buy Citizens of London: The Americans Who Stood with Britain in Its Darkest, Finest Hour books online?
- ISBN13: 9781400067589
- Condition: NEW
- Notes: Brand New from Publisher. No Remainder Mark.
Product Description
In Citizens of London, Lynne Olson has written a work of World War II history even more significant and revealing than her acclaimed Troublesome Young Men. Here is the behind-the-scenes tale of how the United States forged its wartime alliance with Britain, told from the perspective of three key American players in London: Edward R. Murrow, Averell Harriman, and John Gilbert Winant. Drawing from a variety of primary sources, Olson skillfully depicts the dramatic personal journeys of these men who, determined to save Britain from Hitler, helped convince a cautious Franklin Roosevelt and a reluctant American public to support the British at a critical time.
The three—Murrow, the handsome, chain-smoking head of CBS News in Europe; Harriman, the hard-driving millionaire who ran FDR’s Lend-Lease program in London; and Winant, the shy, idealistic U.S. ambassador to Britain—formed close ties with Winston Churchill and were drawn into Churchill’s official and personal circles. So intense were their relationships with the Churchills that they all became romantically involved with members of the prime minister’s family tree: Harriman and Murrow with Churchill’s daughter-in-law, Pamela, and Winant with his favorite daughter, Sarah.
Others were honorary “citizens of London” as well, including the gregarious, fiercely ambitious Dwight D. Eisenhower, an obscure all-purpose who, as the first commander of American forces in Britain, was determined to do everything in his power to make the alliance a success, and Tommy Hitchcock, a world-legendary polo player and World War I fighter pilot who helped save the Allies’ bombing battle against Germany.
Citizens of London, but, is more than just the tale of these Americans and the world leaders they aided and influenced. It’s an engrossing account of the transformative power of personal diplomacy and, above all, a rich, panoramic tale of two cities: Washington, D.C., a bone idle Southern town slowly growing into a hub of international power, and London, a class-conscious capital transformed by the Blitz into a model of stoic grace under violent pressure and deprivation. Deeply human, brilliantly researched, and perfectly written, Citizens of London is a new triumph from an leader swiftly apt one of the finest in her meadow.Amazon.com Review
Amazon Best Books of the Month, February 2010: Citizens of London is the tale of the American firebrands who broke rank with well loved opinion and stood shoulder-to-shoulder with England during the bleak infancy of World War II. Leader Lynne Olson more than lives up to the critical acclaim of her last book, Troublesome Young Men, by exploring the origins of an Anglo-American alliance that helped turn the tide during the most widespread conflict in history. Although additional “Yanks” rallied against the hesitancy of their isolationist government before Pearl Harbor, few matched the impact of U.S. ambassador John Gilbert Winant, businessman Averell Harriman, and broadcaster Edward R. Murrow. Each recognizable the insidious dangers of Nazi aggression, and with the help of meticulous research, Olson elucidates the challenges they endured to help bridge political and cultural gaps between the United States and Britain. At a time when the English capital was described as “swimming in the full tide of history,” Citizens of London echoes Tennyson in its tribute to persons who strove, sought, and refused to yield. –Dave Callanan
Exclusive Q&A with Lynne Olson
Amazon.com: Your last three books (Citizens of London, Troublesome Young Men, and A Question of Honor) have all ears on England during the late 1930’s/early 1940’s. As a historian, what draws you to this period?
Olson: I’ve been fascinated with the place and the period ever since my spouse, Stan Cloud, and I wrote our first book, The Murrow Boys, about Edward R. Murrow and the correspondents he hired to make CBS News before and during World War II. Several scenes in the book take place in London during the Battle of Britain and the 1940-41 Blitz. In doing research for The Murrow Boys, I got caught up in the tale of Britain’s struggle for survival in persons early years of the war – and the extraordinary leadership of Winston Churchill and courage of ordinary Britons in waging that fight. I learned that there were still a number of tales about the period that remained largely unknown and untold, so I chose to tell them myself.
Amazon.com: Had Pearl Harbor not forced America’s hand, how much longer could England have lasted against Germany?
Olson: That’s an brilliant “what if” question. Churchill, for one, was desperately apprehensive that Britain would be defeated by Germany in 1942 if the United States didn’t enter the war. In the days immediately before Pearl Harbor, he knew that the Japanese were also on the go, and he was worried they were going to strike at British territory in Asia. If that had happened, his country would have been forced into a two-front war, with no lifeline from the United States – which nearly assuredly would have meant the end for Britain. So it’s no marvel than when he heard the news of Pearl Harbor on the night of Dec. 7, 1941, he was euphoric. It meant, as he later wrote, that no matter how many military setbacks lay yet to be, “England would live.”
Amazon.com: In contrast to Winant and Murrow, Harriman was a bit of a bourgeois playboy. What made you include him in this book?
Olson: There’s no question that Harriman’s social life was considerably more confused in London than that of Winant and Murrow. At the same time, but, he was a persistent, extremely hard-effective administrator of Lend Lease aid for Britain, who did what he could to speed up the flow of American help to the British and who pushed the Roosevelt administration hard for more vigorous action and more direct involvement in the war. He also carved out for himself reasonably an influential role as conduit and buffer between Roosevelt, Stalin and Churchill.
I also wanted to include Harriman for another reason – to point up the contrast between his tough-minded pragmatism and the idealism of Winant and Murrow. These three men, I reflect, reflected the complexity of America and its attitude to the rest of the world at that time. Winant and Murrow, who championed economic and social reform as well as international cooperation, reflected America’s idealistic side. Harriman, who was intent on broadening his own power and influence, as well as that of his country, became an exemplar of U.S. exceptionalism. In the postwar era, it was his world view that, for the most part, dominated American foreign policy.
Amazon.com: You note an nearly apathetic Churchill response to American dalliances within his family tree. Was this a diplomatic necessity or was he simply too all ears on the larger picture?
Olson: I’m not sure I would call him “apathetic.” I reflect that “pragmatic” would be a better word. I should also point out that it’s not an absolute certainty he knew about the affair that occurred between Averell Harriman and Pamela Churchill, the wife of his son, Randolph, which started in 1941. When Randolph later accused his father of condoning adultery under his own roof, Churchill denied any knowledge of what was going on. That being said, I do judge, as did Pamela, that he was aware of what she and Harriman were up to. Churchill loved Randolph, and while I’m sure he was not tickled about the Pamela/Harriman affair, he knew how vital Harriman and the additional Americans were to the survival of Britain, and he had no intention of letting personal matters interfere with the national interest. Besides, Pamela proved to be a useful conduit for him and Harriman, passing on to each man information and insights she had establish out from the additional.
When Pamela took up with Edward R. Murrow later in the war, she was already separated from Randolph, and I doubt that Churchill cared one way or the additional. As for the affair between his daughter, Sarah, and John Gilbert Winant, the couple kept their involvement exceptionally discreet. Sarah believed her father knew about it, but he never said anything, and I don’t reflect he would have minded.
Amazon.com: Talk about the lower-profile “Citizens of London” — the courageous Americans who violated their own country’s laws to volunteer for the RAF.
Olson: In the late 1930s, as part of its desperate effort to keep the United States out of war, the American government did, as you note, make it illegal for any U.S. citizen to join the military service of a warring power. But, after Britain confirmed war on Germany in September 1939, thousands of young Americans disregarded that law and traveled to England to join the British or Canadian armed forces. Unlike the hordes of Yanks who descended on Britain just prior to D-Day, the early U.S. volunteers became an vital part of Britain’s military and society.
The best-known volunteers were persons who joined the Royal Air Force. Seven U.S. citizens were counted among “The Few” – the celebrated band of RAF pilots who, in their Hurricanes and Spitfires, successfully beat back the Luftwaffe during the Battle of Britain in the summer and fall of 1940. Over the next several months, an additional 300-plus Americans enlisted in the RAF — so many that they were soon agreed their own units, called the Eagle Squadrons. Churchill, who straight away saw what a powerful propaganda tool the American squadrons could be, enthusiastically endorsed the thought.
When the U.S. finally entered the conflict, virtually all the Americans serving in the RAF transferred to the U.S Army Air Forces. Of the 244 pilots who flew in the Eagle Squadrons, more than 40 per cent did not survive the war.
Buy Cheap Citizens of London: The Americans Who Stood with Britain in Its Darkest, Finest Hour Online
Related posts:
- Scott Pilgrim Volume 6: Scott Pilgrim’s Finest Hour
- Into the Dark: The Darkest Fire\The Amazon’s Curse\The Darkest Prison
- Streetwise London Underground Map – The Tube – Laminated London Metro Map – Folding pocket & wallet size metro map for travel
- Rick Steves’ Great Britain 2010 with map
- Citizens of the Sea: Wondrous Creatures From the Census of Marine Life

Want to read it, but not until its $9.99 or less. $15 is too much.
Reader’s Rating: 2 / 5
Why are they (amazon or publisher)charging $14.74 for Kindle edition? No paper, no transportation, no ink. This is B.S. One of the reasons I got a Kindle was the ability to get new releases for $9.99. A selling point that Amazon promoted I might add. It’s honest. The leader gets paid, the publisher gets paid,no fuel burnt to haul them to store or warehouses, and it doesn’t kill any trees….
So….I haven’t read the book, nor will I, til the pricing is addressed.
Reader’s Rating: 1 / 5
I thought I’d delight in this book like I appreciated the leader’s previous Troublesome Young Men. Sorry to say, Lynn Olson made the mistake of opining on current events in the Introduction:
“Facing a rapid decline in the influence and power to which it had laid aver only sixty-odd years before, the United States, with the advent of the administration of Barack Obama, started to acknowledge the need to promote global cooperation rather than only American interests and to erect right partnerships with additional nations.”
That is, of course, nonsense. As Jackson Diehl noted in the February 8, 2010 Washington Post:
“Yet there’s also a disquieting aspect to Obama’s refuge. It’s not just [Spanish Prime Minister] Zapatero who has distress gaining traction in this White House: Unlike most of his predecessors, Obama has not forged close ties with any European leader. Britain’s Brown, France’s Sarkozy and Germany’s Merkel have each, in turn, felt snubbed by him. Relations between Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu are tense at best. George W. Bush used to hold regular videoconferences with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and Afghan President Hamid Karzai. Obama has spoken to them on only a handful of occasions.”
I have a problem with Olson’s cluelessness. If she can’t be an accurate judge of contemporary events, how can we trust what she says about events that took place long before she was born?
Even her view of history is flawed. European disdain for America has been around as long as we have been a nation. Thomas Jefferson labored lacking success to overcome European prejudices. Lincoln was compared to an ape. Wilson was ridiculed for his Fourteen Points. LBJ couldn’t get along with de Gaulle. Reagan’s plot to end to Cold War triggered huge protest marches across Europe. It’s not just the history that took place before she was born that she doesn’t know. It’s events that she ought to remember but appparently doesn’t.
Pondering all that led me to give up this book on page 23. I know small about the three men who are the focus of this book. I’d despise for what I know to be misguided. I give her two stars for effort. She did place a lot of effort into this book. I’ve done enough past research myself to know the work it involves.
–Michael W. Perry, editor of Chesterton on War and Peace: Battling the Thoughts and Movements that Led to Nazism and World War II
Reader’s Rating: 2 / 5
When the fight is over about just how overpriced this is—let me know and I’ll buy it. Otherwise, I’ll simply go to the library. I’m sure it’s as excellent as advertised—but it simply costs too much.
Reader’s Rating: 3 / 5
I hope this isn’t a harbinger of things to come. $1.50 less for kindle vs hard take in? Really? who set this this fee? I’m guessing Random House. I am very interested in reading this book but until the fee of it drops to 9.99 or not more than this can sit on my wish list. There is no justification for pricing a kindle book at this fee in comparison to the hard take in fee. Excellent luck with this new pricing structure if this is what all the loyal kindle users have to look forwards to. It may be time to start boycotting all books that are overpriced due to the publishers jacking the prices up.
Reader’s Rating: 2 / 5