Biocentrism: How Life and Consciousness Are the Keys to Understanding the True Nature of the Universe
Where to buy Biocentrism: How Life and Consciousness Are the Keys to Understanding the Right Scenery of the Universe books online?
- ISBN13: 9781933771694
- Condition: NEW
- Notes: Brand New from Publisher. No Remainder Mark.
Product Description
Every now and then, a simple yet radical thought shakes the very foundations of knowledge. The startling discovery that the world was not flat challenged and ultimately changed the way people perceived themselves and their relationships with the world. For most humans of the 15th century, the notion of Planet as ball of rock was nonsense. The whole of Western natural philosophy is undergoing a sea change again, forced upon us by the experimental findings of quantum theory. At the same time, these findings have increased our doubt and uncertainty about traditional physical explanations of the universe’s genesis and structure.
Biocentrism completes this shift in worldview, turning the planet upside down again with the revolutionary view that life makes the universe as a replacement for of the additional way around. In this new paradigm, life is not just an accidental byproduct of the laws of physics.
Biocentrism takes the reader on a seemingly improbable but ultimately inescapable journey through a foreign universe–our own–from the viewpoints of an acclaimed biologist and a leading astronomer. Switching perspective from physics to biology unlocks the cages in which Western science has unwittingly managed to confine itself. Biocentrism shatters the reader’s thoughts of life, time and space, and even death. At the same time, it releases us from the dull worldview that life is merely the activity of an admixture of carbon and a few additional fundamentals; it suggests the exhilarating possibility that life is fundamentally immortal.
Biocentrism awakens in readers a new sense of possibility and is full of so many shocking new perspectives that the reader will never see reality the same way again.
Buy Cheap Biocentrism: How Life and Consciousness Are the Keys to Understanding the Right Scenery of the Universe Online
Incoming search terms for the article:
buy online lanza biocentrism buy onlineRelated posts:
It is truly incredible how one can write an entire book from misunderstanding one simple principle. When scientists talk about the “observer”, all that that really means is that there is a logically consistent viewpoint of the universe. Quantum physics just tells us that we have a choice of viewpoints, for example, the standard example that we can measure either the speed or position of a particle.
An observer can take a pick of viewpoints, but that doesn’t mean that any additional viewpoint is any less valid. More importantly, no viewpoint needs an observer to be valid. If one insists that a viewpoint needs an observer to be valid, then that means that an observer becomes tied to his or her viewpoint. Tying an observer to one point viewpoint means that s/he is not able to choose viewpoints at random, which basically means that there’s no free will. Everything is already pre-destined. I don’t like this, so naturally, I won’t like the entire premise of the book. I would much rather judge in an infinite number of viewpoints, which I can choose or discard at will. I don’t want to be reliable for the universe. I just want to watch it.
Furthermore, the leader cites a number of unsolved problems in our current understanding of physics. Aside from a lot of flowery language in describing these, there’s nothing. The reason why I have a problem with this is that his logic would can apply at any time in history to any level that physics was at. He’s not presenting any solution to the particular issues that scientists are effective on. If we are to accept his opinion, we can dismiss the entire science of physics. This is rampant nonsense.
Reader’s Rating: 1 / 5
Readers of Owen Barfield’s SAVING THE APPEARANCES will be reminded of its opening pages. Barfield has much more to offer persons who are interested in the correlative relationship between consciousness and scenery. Lanza argues that science shows there was never a time when an external, dumb, physical universe existed, or that life sprang from it at a later date; any universe that could have preceded consciousness only existed in a state of probability waves. His opinion usefully challenge our habits of thought, but he’s probably afflicted by what Barfield calls a residue of unresolved positivism (shown, e.g., in his use of “brain” and “mind” as interchangeables). I reflect the best use of this book could be to prepare readers for the challenge of reading SAVING THE APPEARANCES. There, Barfield deals with implications that Lanza doesn’t seem to be aware of, e.g. with regard to the “prehistory” of the planet. Barfield explores language as a way to search into the evolution of consciousness in this book and additional writings. Dale Nelson’s essay “The Troubled Legacy of Owen Barfield,” published in TOUCHSTONE magazine, is an introduction to the late British thinker. See Lanza’s essay “Biocentrism” in Learn magazine May 2009, and Tim Folger’s article about John Wheeler (anthropic principle) in Learn for June 2002, for introductions to thoughts basic to the present book.
Reader’s Rating: 3 / 5
Robert Lanza is scientifically illiterate, or he is preying on persons who don’t know better to sell books.
Recently Lanza has taken up writing supporting articles for his own theory on the Huffington Post, where he deletes dissenting views, so I’m tending towards the latter. It also doesn’t help that he’s teamed up with well known huckster of pseudoscience Deepak Chopra.
Anyone Interested in learning where Lanza divulges from actual science, I suggest reading this article.
[...]
Reader’s Rating: 1 / 5
This book ongoing well but then went nowhere. It repeatedly hammered the point that consciousness must be accounted for in order to construct a perfect scientific view of the world, but failed to clarify how to go about doing this. An example equation or two incorporating consciousness based variables would have been a excellent start. I also take exception to between quantum collapse exclusively to “consciousness” rather than just “observation”. That said, I do judge that Lanza is on to something that warrants more rigorous investigation.
Reader’s Rating: 2 / 5
I fervently suggest reading “Biocentrism Demystified: A Response to Deepak Chopra and Robert Lanza’s Notion of a Conscious Universe” by Vinod K. Wadhawan and Ajita Kamal. I would provide a link here, but Amazon would likely delete it (for understandable reasons). Just do a Google search.
Although long and dense, it is very well written and at times reasonably humorous. To wit, I quote from the article: “…non-scientists and charlatans cannot be permitted to twist facts to satisfy the hunger of humans for the feel-excellent or feel-vital factor. The scientific method is such that scientists feel excellent when they are doing excellent science.”
“Biocentrism” is yet another new-agey misrepresentation and misapplication of quantum physics. It is (IMHO) patently absurd to extrapolate from the incredibly tiny quantum world into the macro world of human beings. It would be like adage that, because electrons and positrons are attracted to each additional, your best life partner is a name who is completely unlike you. Or that, since matter can not be made or ruined, you are immortal.
I’ll close with a quote:
“It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, but satisfying and reassuring.”
— Carl Sagan
Reader’s Rating: 1 / 5