Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business
Where to buy Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business books online?
- ISBN13: 9780143036531
- Condition: USED – VERY GOOD
- Notes:
Product Description
Originally published in 1985, Neil Postman’s groundbreaking polemic about the corrosive effects of television on our politics and public discourse has been hailed as a twenty-first-century book published in the twentieth century. Now, with television joined by more sophisticated electronic media—from the Internet to cell phones to DVDs—it has taken on even greater significance. Amusing Ourselves to Death is a prophetic look at what happens when politics, television journalism, education, and even religion become theme to the demands of entertainment. It is also a blueprint for regaining controlof our media, so that they can serve our highest goals.
Buy Cheap Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business Online
Related posts:
- Public Speaking for College and Career with Connect Plus Public Speaking
- How to Start a Home-Based Jewelry Making Business: *Turn your passion into profit *Develop a smart business plan *Set market-appropriate prices *Profit … on the Internet
- The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution
- Forgotten Skills of Cooking: The Time-Honored Ways are the Best – Over 700 Recipes Show You Why
- The Biggest Loser Fitness Program: Fast, Safe, and Effective Workouts to Target and Tone Your Trouble Spots–Adapted from NBC’s Hit Show!
I had to read this book for school, and ket me just tell you it was one of the toughest things I’ve ever done. I’m an avid reader but this bunch of philosophical garbage I couldn’t stomach. The writer is a hypocrite and unless you want to be place to sleep, don’t bother
Reader’s Rating: 1 / 5
Postman posits that people will come to ” “adore the technologies that undo their capacities to reflect.” Hmm…I marvel what he’d say about amazon.com or the litany of book superstores that pepper our suburbs. Postman’s flamboyant declinism is nothing less than ridiculous.
Reader’s Rating: 1 / 5
I’m deeply concerned that the chair of the communcations dept. for a major university wrote this work. Not because of the banal message, but because of the terrible writing style of the leader. After a few chapters, I establish myself counting the times he used the word “epistomology”.
I got the impression he was trying to fill space in order to make a book of credible part. Futhermore, most of his conclusions are either painfully self-evident or easily shown to be misguided. I could have made the same mundane observations in a few pages that the leader took an entire book to pace over, back and into the world.
Reader’s Rating: 1 / 5
Postman’s opinion are rarely based on hard science, he is very polemic. There is a book by a media scientist who takes apart all auf Postman’s opinion in “amusing yourself to death”. But he is not adage that Postman is incorrect on everything he is justing adage that Postman is guessing and that he cannot prove his findings at all. Just too sad, that I don’t remember the name of that book. Anyone?
Reader’s Rating: 2 / 5
Yes, this book is a powerful indictment of media culture. BUT it also “laments” rather than critiques, longing for a past that was “better” only for white, educated, Christian men! Look out for the minefields of Native American slur jokes, omission of statistics about women (or placement into parentheses of these facts), ignorance of the immigrant experience, and implicit denial of slavery. Postman is so wonderful in some ways, it is deeply sad he is so biased by his white maleness that he boasts of ideal literacy excise in the 1800s while all I can reflect of is that slaves were forbidden from this pursuit, women weren’t educated, and immigrants worked in factories or mines. Only white men can truly be enthralled with such a book, and that is sad, because it is so politically perceptive and powerful in its attack on media otherwise. Don’t say things were better in the past, just say things have permanently been oppressive (literacy was also about the oppression of the oral culture of the Native peoples whose country this was first!) and the argument will be much less foolish in the early chapters.
Reader’s Rating: 2 / 5